Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Our
Evolution
If we don’t do
it, who will?
by
Bela H. Banathy &
Gordon Rowland
Guiding Our Evolution
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Why worry?
7. Conclusion
Guiding Our Evolution
Banathy & Rowland
1. Introduction
~~~~~~~
This book is about the past, the present, and the future. We
ask where humans came from and who we have become. We
reflect on where we might go and on the decisions we face in
doing so.We ask these questions at a crucial moment in human
history.
2. Why worry?
Tracy Chapman
This book is about how we can make these changes and how
we can create a future that we desire. We’ll look at how we
humans came to be the way we are, where present paths are taking
us, what forces seem to be at work, and how and where we can
make a difference. We’ll try to do this by responding to a series of
simple, yet powerful questions. The first is “Why worry?” or
perhaps “What’s in it for me?” The answer is that this is a critical
time in history. Now more than ever before, the understandings
we’ve acquired and the power we’ve gained to influence global
events place the future of our species and our world squarely on
our shoulders.
Here is another way to put it. We’re facing a new reality, one
of massive societal changes that touch the lives of every
individual, community, and nation. This new reality raises
questions: Are we only spectators of these changes? Are we
destined to be their victims? Do we have to leave decisions
affecting our lives to others? Are we at the mercy of "social
engineers" and politicians who design systems and laws for us?
The answer we will develop in this book is a resounding NO.
To get started, here are the two basic concepts we will work
with: evolutionary consciousness and conscious evolution.
Activities
Throughout the book we will suggest simple activities that will
enrich your understanding of the concepts and principles we
describe. We’ll try to make them simple, short, and fun, so we
hope you will give them a try. Here are a couple to get started.
Who are we? Why are we here? Where did we come from?
These sorts of questions have likely been on our minds ever since
our species gained consciousness. The answer seems to depend on
whom you ask. Philosophers and early scientists up to the end of
th
the 18 century could only speculate. For example, they imagined
that the universe as a whole followed the life cycles they saw in
themselves and their environment. It was born, it grew, and it
would eventually die. Thinking positively, it would be followed by
another world that was more complex and more perfect. Other
people who did not interpret the Bible literally added the
possibility that animals that lived in the sea evolved to live on the
land.
th th
In the 19 and early 20 centuries scientists such as Alfred
Russell Wallace and Charles Darwin took this evolutionary
possibility as a starting point. From their observations of the world,
Wallace and Darwin guessed that plants and animals evolved
through a process called natural selection. They saw that plants
and animals around the world had somehow adapted themselves to
a remarkable range of environments, and suggested that this could
have happened by a gradual process in which slight variations were
inherited by the next generations. For example, a particular
characteristic might help a plant grow better in a certain climate,
and as a result this characteristic would be favored and passed
along to the next generations. It would be naturally selected over
Guiding Our Evolution
Homo Habilis may have been the first humanoid to use tools,
for example, stone hammers. Their brains were larger than
Australopithecus Afarensis, they lived in campsites and in kinship
Guiding Our Evolution
simply Neanderthal. The Neanderthals are the basis for most of our
images of “cavemen.” They lived in caves and open-air shelters in
Europe and Asia during an ice age. They developed very strong
bones and muscles to survive in these inhospitable areas, and
bulbous noses to warm incoming air. They lacked the high rounded
foreheads, prominent chins, and other physical features of Archaic
Sapiens, and rather than in kinship groups like the Archaic
Sapiens, they lived in relative isolation from one another.
Surprisingly, they had larger brains than modern humans, but it’s
unclear to what use these were put. Neanderthal failed to change
over thousands of years and, as a result, became extinct about
35,000 years ago. Notice how these two things happened at the
same time. The Archaic Sapiens and Neanderthal lived together on
the earth for 65,000 years, but then as Archaic Sapiens evolved
into modern humans, the Neanderthal disappeared. One species
adapted and survived while the other did not.
Evolutionary processes
So, what do these stories of our ancestors tell us? First, they
tell us that there are three evolutionary processes:
This leads to the second thing that the stories of our ancestors
tell us—that evolution is now very much affected by our choices.
In fact, our choices don’t just cause changes in our culture.
Because of scientific and technological advances, they also affect
Guiding Our Evolution
But all these parts can’t just do their own things. They have
to work together. So, a greater number of parts leads to greater
dependence on one another and, therefore, greater integration.
(Remember that everything relates.) Greater differentiation plus
greater integration means greater complexity, and this is the basic
path of evolution—toward greater complexity. We’ll talk more
about complexity later. The important point to remember is that
evolution leads toward greater complexity, not toward simplicity.
Cultural evolution
Since the emergence of Archaic Sapiens we have been in a
third phase of evolutionary processes, one dominated by cultural
evolution. Recall that physical evolution referred to matter and our
physical environment, and biological evolution referred to living
things such as plants and animals. Cultural evolution refers to
changes in how we humans live and learn, and to how we relate to
one another.
Co-evolution
Notice how one type of evolutionary process made the next
type possible. Physical evolution somehow reached a point where
life was possible, and biological evolution reached a point where
human consciousness and culture were possible. For example, the
biological development of the human brain and the shaping of our
vocal chords made it possible for spoken languages to develop, and
thus the transmission of information across groups and the
development of cultures. It’s accurate to describe the processes as
mutually influencing or co-evolutionary. This is especially clear
st
here at the beginning of the 21 century when we humans have
gained the ability to not only shape culture, but to change biology
Guiding Our Evolution
and the physical world. How we use this ability may prove a
greater challenge than gaining it.
Evolutionary cycles
The stories of our ancestors tell us three more things. First,
they demonstrate how evolution happens in cycles. For example,
the generations of Homo Sapiens emerged, developed and
matured, then declined and disappeared. There seemed to be a
creative surge that led them to succeed as a species, but then a
rigidity and inability to further adapt that led them to fail.
Core Ideas
3.1. Using a variety of evidence and new techniques and tools we
have learned much about where we came from.
3.2. Our early ancestors include Australopithecus Afarensis, Homo
Habilis, Homo Erectus, Archaic Sapiens, and Neanderthal.
3.3. Each of our ancestors developed and thrived for a period of
time then either adapted to changes in the environment or
disappeared. Neanderthal failed to adapt and became extinct,
while the Archaic Sapiens evolved to become the modern
human being.
3.4. There have been three generations of modern human: the Cro-
Magnon, followed by humans of the agricultural and industrial
revolutions.
3.5. Geological, biological and cultural evolution involve different
processes and occur on different timetables. Cultural evolution
has now gained prominence because of its speed and impact.
3.6. Evolution occurs in cycles of birth, development, and decline.
The beginning of an evolutionary cycle is marked by the
emergence of a new whole, not just a changed part.
3.7. We are on the brink of a fourth generation of modern human.
What that generation will become is unclear.
Activities
A. Five billion years. Three and a half billion years. Five to seven
million years. It’s hard to think in terms of billions and millions of
years and to see how very short our lives are. Maybe this analogy
will help. Pretend that you are as old as the human species. That
age, five million years, is 1,000 times smaller than how long ago
the earth took the form we see today, five billion years. So multiple
your age times 1,000. If the human species were as old as you, this
would be how long ago the earth settled into the form we see
today.
Try it the other way around. Divide your age by 1,000 and figure
out how many weeks or days that would equal (after dividing,
Guiding Our Evolution
Try this with other ages, like the emergence of modern humans
(200,000 years ago) or the 2,000 years since Christ’s birth.
C. Think about what each part of your body does. Are there parts
that you use very heavily? Parts that you don’t use at all? What do
you imagine will happen over time and generations to these parts if
that pattern of use continues?
D. Explain where our species came from to an 8-10 year old child.
In this story there are many lessons for us. First, changes
happened in cycles. A new species suddenly appeared; it developed
and matured; its patterns became stable and resistant to change, causing
it to lose its ability to adapt; and it declined and disappeared. This is
true not only of distinct species, but of the generations of modern
human. Second, change appears to be rapidly accelerating. It took four
million years to get from Australopithecus Afarensis to Homo Habilis;
only 165,000 years to get from Archaic Sapiens to modern human; and
the third generation of modern humans appeared less than 10,000 years
Guiding Our Evolution
Consciousness
A fifth lesson we can draw from the story is that the leap in
consciousness as each of our ancestors emerged was key to our
becoming human. By consciousness we mean the ability to see
ourselves as separate from the world—to observe ourselves in
relation to others and our environment.
Taking perhaps the most profound step, here at the end of the
third generation we have developed an understanding of the processes
by which we came to be the way we are—we have developed
evolutionary consciousness. Evolutionary consciousness is likely to be
the key as we shift the view from where we came from to where we are
going.
extinction, on the order of 30,000 species lost per year. To put this
in perspective, the last mass extinction was 65 million years ago!
Future possibilities
So where might we go? Here are some scenarios of what
might be ahead.
It’s up to us
There are several important things to notice about these sorts
of scenarios. First, these are not wild futuristic visions. Every
single possibility mentioned above is based on an effort that is
already underway!
Core Ideas
4.1. Generation 3 modern human is in decline. Its characteristics
are no longer in sync with its environment. It must either adapt
or face extinction.
4.2. The emergence of each generation of modern human was
marked by a leap in consciousness.
4.3. Evolutionary consciousness is a promising marker of
Generation 4.
4.4. There are many possible futures. They will bring us better or
worse circumstances, not a utopia.
4.5. Such areas as politics, economics, technology, and culture
interdepend, so our chances of creating better circumstances for
the future are improved by taking a systemic perspective.
4.6. The transformation to Generation 4 will not be easy. It
requires that we embrace rather than resist change and seek
complexity rather than simplicity.
4.7. We cannot predict exactly how our actions will affect the
future, but they certainly will do so.
Activities
A. Look around the space surrounding you at this moment. Ask
yourself why it is the way it is. For example, if you are indoors ask
why the room is a certain size and shape, why the ceilings are a
certain height, why the floors are a certain material, the lights and
furniture arranged in a particular way. Who caused these to be this
way? Imagine what human surroundings will look like in 100
years. Create both positive and negative images. What human
actions today would lead toward the more positive or more
negative images?
the past. What actions and events in the next few years might make
the story come true? Did we experience Orwell’s vision of 1984?
Clark or Kubrick’s vision of 2001? Why/why not?
Change is possible
Yes, individual humans can make a difference. What would
our understanding of physics be without Einstein? How would our
music sound without Mozart? What would the political map of
Europe look like if there had been no Hitler? Would there be a
United States without Abraham Lincoln? What would be different
in the lives of Americans without Martin Luther King, Jr.?
condensing, the jet would not have made a difference. The pilot
and steward’s actions might have had other consequences but
would not have led to rain. What determines whether an action or
event has a large impact? More than anything in the action or event
itself, it is the conditions in which it occurs. In a very real way it is
a system’s readiness or sensitivity to being influenced that
determines the impact of an event or action. Similarly, we may
have what we think is a great idea, but if the conditions aren’t right
then it may go nowhere. For example, others need to recognize it
as good, to perceive that it has a goodness of fit with their
understanding of the situation.
Making a difference
But if context is so important, then how can we make a
difference on purpose? How can we know which action to take
Guiding Our Evolution
So, can you make a difference? Yes, but if what you want
from it is fame or credit, then you’ll likely be disappointed. You’ll
never know the true effects of your contribution. Instead you’ll
know that you worked toward a worthwhile goal—in this case, the
Banathy & Rowland
Core Ideas
5.1. Change is possible. The past does not completely determine
the future.
5.2. Individual actions can make a difference. Depending on
conditions, small actions can have major effects.
5.3. The same action may trigger a major change or better prepare
a system for such. The person who takes the action and others
can know the difference only afterward (if ever).
5.4. History tends to tell us about the trigger, the isolated event or
action, rather than the preparation, so we tend to believe
deceptively simple interpretations of complex situations.
5.5. Our ability to consciously evolve is greatly enhanced by
working together, by engaging with one another.
5.6. It is ethical to design with not for others.
Activities
A. Think of an important invention not mentioned in this chapter.
What social, political, and economic conditions made it possible
for that invention to be widely adopted.
(1) design the future rather than plan or try to fix the past;
• Similarly, focus on doing the right thing rather than the wrong
thing righter. Efficiency means doing more in less time for less
cost, while effectiveness means accomplishing goals. Focus first
on effectiveness. Otherwise we can waste much effort and create
ways to more efficiently do things that are not relevant to our
goals.
Say that you decide to go for a walk after dinner. You choose
a certain route because you assume that it will be safe and that
your heart and lungs will handle the strain. You select certain
shoes and clothing because you assume they will be comfortable
and will protect you in the weather. You may take the walk
because you believe that walking is good for you, that exercise will
improve your health, and that better health will lead to a longer
life. Given these beliefs, you choose to walk because you value
fitness and longevity.
• Design with and within, not for. It is the right of people to guide
their destiny, to take part directly in decisions affecting their lives.
Therefore, designing is something for everyone to do, not for an
outsider to do for others.
New Agoras
We may find inspiration in the Agoras of classical Greece.
The Agoras were places of assembly where democracy was
practiced. Each year forty assemblies were held and citizens had
the opportunity to deliberate and make decisions about issues that
affected their lives and the lives of their communities. The
proceedings were governed by a democratic constitution, and this
constitution brought everyday citizens into an active role in the
service of the common good. Perhaps we can bring the Agora
concept and experience back to life. True participative democracy
could become the guiding idea for our society and the engine for
conscious evolution. The Agora as an image of a self-designing
community might capture our imagination and help us see
possibilities.
Core Ideas
6.1. Designing is different from planning or trying to fix what
exists. It involves imagining new possibilities.
6.2. Designers use reason and intuition, depend on judgments
rather than decisions, are proactive rather than reactive, and
embrace diversity of viewpoints.
6.3. Most situations of importance are dynamic and complex and
require systems thinking.
6.4. To be able to work together we need to uncover and
understand our own and each other’s assumptions, beliefs, and
values.
6.5. Communities and education have the most potential for
making connections among new developments that will lead to
Generation 4 modern human.
6.6. Conversation represents a new way of being together. It is a
powerful tool for designing, systems thinking, and uncovering
assumptions, beliefs, and value. It offers much to the
development and ongoing work of communities and education.
Guiding Our Evolution
Activities
A. Think about an action you took recently. What did you intend to
accomplish? What were your general and specific goals? What
assumptions did you make? What beliefs and values guided you?
B. Reflect on recent discussions you have had in which you did not
agree with another person’s point of view. What assumptions did
you make? What assumptions did he or she seem to make? What
values and beliefs led you to your point of view? What values and
beliefs likely led to his or her point of view?
7. Conclusion
Resources
For more information, here are some key sources:
Banathy, B. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world.
NY: Plenum Publishers.
Banathy, B. H. (2000). Guided evolution of society. NY: Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Bohm, D. (1996). On Dialogue. NY: Routledge.
Boulding, K. (1985). Human betterment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Chaisson, E. (1987). The life era. NY: The Atlantic Monthly Press.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. NY:
John Wiley & Sons.
Churchman, W. C. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies.
NY: Basic Books.
Csanyi, V. (1989). Evolutionary systems and society. Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self. NY: HarperCollins
Publishers.
Davis, P. (1992). The mind of God. NY: Simon & Schuster.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. NY: Oxford University
Press.
Dennett, D. (1996). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the
meanings of life. NY: Touchstone.
Elgin, D. (1993). Awakening Earth. NY: William Morrow and
Company.
Friedman, T. L. (2000) The lexus and the olive tree (updated and
expanded edition). NY: Anchor Books.
Gleick, J. (1999). Faster: The acceleration of just about
everything. NY: Pantheon.
Gould, S. (1996). Full house. NY: Three River Press.
Banathy & Rowland
Contact
Gordon Rowland, PhD
Professor of Communications
Roy H. Park School of Communications
Ithaca College
Ithaca, NY 14850
rowland@ithaca.edu
(607) 274-1031
http://faculty.ithaca.edu/rowland/